Information + Critical Thinking

Analyzes where your information comes from and identifies gaps or overconcentration.

For controversial topics, identifies whether expert opinion is settled, contested, or actively debated.

Evaluates claims and identifies what would constitute better evidence.

Identifies common cognitive biases at play in a decision or belief you’re evaluating.

Makes percentages, relative/absolute risk, and p-values meaningful in plain language.

Explains what a research study actually shows including strength of evidence and limitations.

Rates credibility of health and science information based on source type, credentials, citations, and funding.